5 comments
Somnonaut
Somnonaut

But, but, they had "neuroscientific research" How can you POSSIBLY question that?

concernedacademic
concernedacademic

Is the absurd appeal to neuroscience in this article meant as a joke? Very bad quality science journalism and a disservice to public understanding of the limits and use of neuroscience. The editors should really consider consulting with academics before publishing such material, unless it is meant as comedy, of course.

Coriolanus1775
Coriolanus1775

You have the lower body and you have no upper body, you got a problem building...wait a minute. You have the upper body, and you have no legs, you got a problem building your legs. You have the upper...you have the lower body and you don't have the upper body, the upper body, it is easier to build. So if you have the lower body and you don't have the upper body, it is easier to build the upper body. You have the upper body and you don't have the legs, you got a problem building the lower body... No, you don't understand. You have the upper body, but you don't have the lower body, you got a problem building downstairs. You got the up- legs on the bottom, it is easier to build on the top, so you don't have much as a problem. Yeah.