Forever 21 Threatens to Sue Mocking Fashion Blogger

  • Share
  • Read Later
Dimitrios Kambouris / Getty

Forever 21 Times Square opening celebration at Forever 21 Times Square Flagship Store on June 24, 2010 in New York City.

Clothing giant Forever 21 is threatening to sue fashion blogger Rachel Kane of WTForever21.com for “trademark infringement, copyright infringement, unfair competition and dilution” of the Forever 21 brand. She has until June 10 to shut down her site.

WTForever21 is a no-holds-barred blog bristling with F-bombs and snarky commentary on Forever 21’s fashion missteps. The posts bash products that Kane finds ridiculous and often end with the phrase: “Forever 21, WTF?” In describing Fashion 21’s “Loop Yarn Sweater Vest” ($17.99), for example, Kane writes, “ Guacamole and vomit stains will blend right the eff into this doodoo colored thing.”

(LIST: The 25 Best Blogs of 2011)

Kane, however, is a devout consumer of the “fast fashion” mainstream American chain and also praises the products she favors.

“Don’t get me wrong,” she shares on her blog. “I LOVE Forever 21. Most of my closet is comprised of their tasteful, trendy and totally awesome selections. But every now and then, something goes horribly awry.”

But what’s worse than a “horribly awry” handbag encrusted with sequins and pom poms? A lawsuit.

In a post by Jezebel, a copy of the cease-and-desist letter is posted, indicating that Los Angeles-based Forever 21 has serious issues with the blog’s URL. The site’s name, according to the letter, “refers to an abbreviation for colloquial expression that the general public may find offensive, and such colloquial expression is being used in conjunction with our Company’s name, registered trademark, and domain name.

This, despite the fact that Kane clearly notes in her blog (in more than one place) that her site “is not affiliated with Forever 21, Inc.”

In the letter, the company does take into account Kane’s support of the stores, noting that they value both Kane’s “indicated patronage” and respect “one’s right to express his/her opinion.” But Forever 21 is going to sue her anyway, unless she deletes her site before June 10.

(PHOTOS: A Day in the Life of a Fashion Week Model)

6 comments
albert71292
albert71292

Wake me when they get "Not Necessarily The News"... haven't seen that show since the 1980's!

JimmyRhapsody
JimmyRhapsody

It's a good first step for HBO, but if they really want to tap the cord-cutter market, they'll need to do a better job of providing timely access to content.  Most people are willing to wait a few months after broadcast to legally stream content, but 3 years is a bit much.

Channah
Channah

I order perhaps 75%, or more, of all the items I buy from Amazon.  The 3-5 days it takes is fine with me-that is fast enough.  And, I don't have HBO as I look at their lineup and see next to nothing I care to watch.  So, not sure it'd be worth $20/yr  to have it, let alone $99/yr.  So, Amazon Prime is of no use to me at all.

LLAndrewsKS
LLAndrewsKS

So - I didn't see 'Game of Thrones' mentioned in the list of shows available. It's really the only reason I have HBO. Will it be included?


DrDave
DrDave

@LLAndrewsKS  It sounds like it probably will be available, but not until three years or so after a season originally airs.

danjtrudeau
danjtrudeau

@DrDave @LLAndrewsKS  And that's why it won't be available until down the road.  A lot of subscribers would jump ship tomorrow if they could see the shows in a timely manner from Amazon.  I'm sure even this deal took a lot of arm twisting at HBO.