Blame Canada? UN Slams New Anti-Protest Law

  • Share
  • Read Later
AP Photo/The Canadian Press

Protesters march through the streets of Montreal to protest Quebec's Bill 78, which many consider as a violation of freedoms of speech, assembly, and movement.

Last year the United Nations ranked it as the sixth best country to live in the world. This week, it’s calling Canada a human rights violator, slamming it for a new anti-protest law that was passed in the province of Quebec. ”Moves to restrict freedom of assembly in many parts of the world are alarming,” said Navi Pillay, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights. “In the context of student protests, I am disappointed by the new legislation passed in Quebec that restricts their rights to freedom of association and of peaceful assembly.”

The National Assembly of Quebec passed Bill 78 on May 18 after months of student protests against rising tuition fees in the province. The law requires organizers of protests involving 50 or more people to notify the police with details of the demonstration eight hours beforehand. Offenders are required to pay daily fines ranging from $1,000 to $125,000, depending on their involvement and leadership role in the protests.

In response to Pillay’s statement, Hillel Neuer, the director of UN Watch, a human rights organization that monitors UN compliance with its own charter, argued that even though Canada is fair game for criticism, it is “simply absurd” to highlight Canada without citing violations in countries such as China, Belarus, and Cuba. “When a prosecutor goes after jaywalkers while allowing rapists and murderers to roam free, that’s not only illogical, but immoral,” added Neuer.

Meanwhile, Amnesty International said Bill 78 “breaches Canada’s international human rights obligations”.

MORE:  Historic Montreal Protests, Once About Student Tuition, Now Decry an ‘Unconstitutional’ Government Response

1 comments
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Joao
Joao

How can one be anti-UN, if there is no UN, if there are no rights, if there are no war, if there is no country, it is all a facade to get money and with that money control all people around the world. If people get registered in they born place, but they get nothing for that, like receiving money every week because they borned there, but no, they are educated to work, and if they earn any money they have to pay others to live in the place where they born, because there are no country, unless you are a disabled person, then the others that can work have to pay for you to live at their expenses, but all is a facade because in order to disabled people receive your money, many others work to that happen, and that process costs more than the disabled people gets; and the UN is all that and more, in order to prevent the world of produce, they implement rules that are so expensive that those that have tried it, spend more money that the one that is earned, which makes everyone that works under the UN rules to have more debts than credits; and those that do not produce under UN rules are considered criminals, and get sent to jail or killed. But bottom line it is all about money, even UN rules are used and abused just to get money, the rest is scenarios to kill and destroy any chance of people to be independent, and force them to pay taxes for nothing, cause they pay taxes and then they have to pay for food and everything else, and even then they get expired food and goods, marked has valid...