The New Jersey Ivy League school is first in its class, according to Forbes’ criteria for top colleges. In its annual list, Forbes rated national universities based on five categories: post-graduate success, student satisfaction, debt, four-year graduation rate and competitive awards like Fulbright scholarships and Ph.D candidacies.
Such methodology produced results unlike those usually seen in those by U.S. News & World Report, which includes data on undergraduate reputation and student selectivity.
The rankings, which were calculated by the Center for College Affordability and Productivity, “focus on the things that matter the most to students: quality of teaching, great career prospects, high graduation rates and low-levels of debt,” Forbes’ Michael Noer stated in an accompanying article. “They do not attempt to assess a school’s reputation, nor are they a measure of academic selectivity and we pointedly ignore any metrics that would encourage schools to engage in wasteful spending.”
Unlike other lists, Forbes combines both research universities and liberal arts colleges onto the same chart. This, coupled with their unique methodology (but really, what survey doesn’t have a novel system?) created some eyebrow-raising results.
What were some of the surprises? The top 10 was not dramatic; it included traditionally strong institutions like Stanford (3), Yale (5) and Williams College (2). But Pomona College, a small and competitive California liberal arts school, came in at number 9, relegating Ivys like Brown and the University of Pennsylvania to low-sounding rankings in the teens.
Outside of that top tier live some more unexpected pairs of schools and numbers. These include Washington and Lee (15) Cornell (51), under-the-radar Hillsdale College (82).
The rankings’ intermittent curveballs affected some more than others. Haverford College called out Forbes for its results after the Pennsylvania liberal arts college inexplicably plunged to number 27 after being ranked seventh last year.
The Philadelphia Inquirer reported that the drop was the result of a data entry error. Forbes will not adjust their rankings, which were already published in print, but the magazines did post a correction on its website.
Click here for the full list.