27 Animals Died During Making of The Hobbit, Say Handlers

  • Share
  • Read Later
Jason Redmond / REUTERS
Jason Redmond / REUTERS

Peter Jackson, director of the Hobbit trilogy

In the upcoming film The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey, Bilbo Baggins encounters myriad dangers. But no one expected the animals that appeared in the $500 million trilogy to do the same in real life.

According to a report by the Associated Press, animal wranglers hired to oversee some 150 animals used in the films say 27 of them died because they were housed on a treacherous farm full of “death traps,” including bluffs, sinkholes and jagged fencing. The dead include a miniature pony called Rainbow, hired as a hobbit horse, who crashed off a bank on the farm and broke his back. When the wrangler found him in the morning, he was still alive, and later had to be euthanized.

The other dead animals include a horse named Claire (found with her head in a stream after toppling off a bluff), six goats, six sheep and a dozen chickens that were reportedly torn apart by dogs on two different occasions. Two other horses, Molly and Doofus, got caught in fencing and ripped their legs open, suffering significant injuries.

The wranglers for the movies say they tried to alert their bosses and production company behind The Hobbit to how dangerous the New Zealand farm was, but the animals were not relocated.

(MORE: The Hobbit: What We Know So Far About Peter Jackson’s Epic Trilogy)

One wrangler, Chris Langridge, hired in November 2010 to oversee 50 horses, said he tried to plug some of the sinkholes and repair the fences himself. In the end, however, the task was too big: he was the one who found Rainbow the pony dying of a broken back. Langridge and his wife Lynn, also a wrangler, quit the production in February 2011 after witnessing several animals get hurt. They subsequently sent a letter to The Hobbit trilogy’s unit-production manager, Brigitte Yorke, describing the situation on the farm. Yorke replied with a request for more information, which the Langridges provided. They didn’t hear from her again.

Another wrangler, Johnny Smyth, said that even after Claire the horse died and the horses were moved to stables, the deaths continued. He alleges that a horse named Zeppelin died from stomach problems after being given a new kind of feed, though no autopsy was performed and veterinary records say the horse died of a broken blood vessel. Smyth says he was fired from his post in October 2011 after a disagreement with his boss about the animals’ welfare.

The Hobbit director Peter Jackson’s spokesperson acknowledged to the Associated Press that two horses had died unnecessarily, adding that the production company had taken swift action to remedy the situation, upgrading the animal housing in 2011 at a cost of thousands of dollars. A representative of the American Humane Association, which investigated the farm in late 2011, said the AHA “made safety recommendations to the animals’ living areas. The production company followed our recommendations and upgraded fence and farm housing, among other things.”

According to Jackson’s spokesperson, the production company of The Hobbit no longer uses the farm in question to house animals. He added that Jackson had adopted three pigs used in the making of the trilogy, the first instalment of which will premiere on Nov. 28 in Wellington, New Zealand.

246 comments
EricPazFong
EricPazFong

Cool, animal dies. What about these human in middle east? Oh, I forgot PETA don't care about human need to live from eating

NaomiAnderson
NaomiAnderson

Alright! More dog food for my pets, food on my table, and glue to shut the mouths of the morons at PETA.

SarahClairePicton
SarahClairePicton

This is disgusting, what is being done about it? Thanks for posting this... Will definitely share to everyone in Cape Town - it's showing at the moment down the road. 

NandaLinnAung
NandaLinnAung

it's tough to make a film in the middle of nowhere.. sad to see animals died..

syzygysb
syzygysb

Too sad,  the whole debacle.  Animals, those in our care,  trust us and look to us to protect them and keep them from harm.  This story made me feel very angry at whomever was in charge of animal safety.  I hope the person responsible is properly punished. And Peter Jackson must make certain that this never happens again,  while the animals are on his watch.

ShawnLa
ShawnLa

Oh and these allegations are from PETA. Case closed.

DavidAdams1
DavidAdams1

@ShawnLa How do you know the allegations come from PETA?

TaraSimpson
TaraSimpson

The allegations came from the wranglers who witnessed this first hand, PETA took the facts and ran with it.

ShawnLa
ShawnLa

Ben hur- 1 person and 5 horses died.

Flicka (2006) two horses killed

Apocalypse Now (1979) Water buffalo killed live on film at the end of the movie

Luck (tv show) 3 dead horses

The Adventures Of Milo and Otis (1986/1989) Rumored 20 kittens killed while filming

And a ton of other movies and tv s hows where animals were killed.

ShawnLa
ShawnLa

Animals die. Having been raised on a farm, it doesn't sound that unrealistic for the amount of time it took to film these films. Accidents happen, animals get loose, it's how the world works.

MichelleMorris
MichelleMorris like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 5 Like

I know that my family and I will NOT be going to see or rent this movie and I WILL be sharing this with all of my facebook friends as I am sure that they will do the same. I am horribly ashamed of the humans that were involved with this movie and I believe that they should be held responsible for animal cruelty for each count since they each knew of the dangers that they were involving these innocent animals in that did not have a choice to be included in the movie( unlike the humans)

ShawnLa
ShawnLa

@MichelleMorris Give me a break. There's a big difference between cruelty and deaths that occur do to nature. 

Patrich
Patrich

@ShawnLa @MichelleMorris

Animals will die over time due to natural causes, and several of the animals that died during the production of this (wonderful, by the way, can't wait for the other two) movie roamed out of their pens/stables/wherever they were, and if life were to work like you would WANT it to, none of these animals would be able to have air, a place to walk, or happiness.

Animal Cruelty involves either knowingly ignoring an animals dangers to itself, usually coming form it's environment, and not attempting to change it so that way it is no longer at danger. Or purposely degrading it's life and causing strife to it's being, or physically striking it.

Neither of these things happened, so learn how to read situations from the other side, and to expand your point of view

TaraSimpson
TaraSimpson

Actually, these animals died from negligence. The wranglers in charge warned and tried to do something about the living conditions that posed risks to no avail. The animals wouldn't have died if they were housed in better conditions.

SammieArnold1
SammieArnold1

Yet they wont get done by Animal Welfare will they!?

LeonardCat
LeonardCat like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 6 Like

TROLL ALERT! (And I don't mean the hobbit kind.) Some of the people making comments here have a gigantic attitude problem and seem to be throwing bait. What do a person's dietary habits have to do with the story published? Everyone knows that ALL movie studios are in it to make profit, and ALL production companies will cut corners if they can get away with it. This is not about whether the finished movie has cinematic merit. It probably does. But animals must be well treated, even when the movie is shot outside the US. 

TaylorDeree
TaylorDeree

Well, that sure puts a damper on the story.

CVActor1
CVActor1 like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 3 Like

I would be VERY surprised if at the end of the film the "no animals were hurt during the making of this film" quote appears. But I don't plan to see it - PARTICULARLY after reading this. Those POOR animals.

Karma13
Karma13 like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 3 Like

Has anyone, who is justifying the production company's response, paid attention to the dates listed in the article? They were told by the wranglers for several months that the property was unsafe and animals were dying. One wrangler and his wife quit in Feb. 2011, because there was no improvement. It wasn't until the AHA got involved several months later in late 2011 that the company took any action to remedy the situation. So, you still think they took the correct course of action? It appears to me that they were more likely trying to avoid fines and/or punishments handed down from that inspection. The issues should have been handled when they occurred and when they were brought to light by the wranglers, not after the inspection when they were told to make the changes.

ShawnLa
ShawnLa

@Karma13 A few animals died to accidents in the terrain. That happens. Just riding a horse puts them in danger, and in fact horse's are pretty fragile animals. I was raised on horses, have owned dozens, and have lost a few to the horses own actions, IE, broke leg in a gopher hole, etc.

Karma13
Karma13 like.author.displayName 1 Like

@ShawnLa  We own horses too. We travel, trail ride, and do shows with them. I'm well aware that they can become injured, but does that mean they should be left in an environment that is unsafe?
 One of our geldings got caught up in a fence trying to get to a neighbor's new horse. We freed him, vetted him, and moved him from that pasture so it wouldn't happen again. We have never lost any of our horses to anything other then old age.
 The facts in this article seem to point to irresponsibility on their part, because they were aware of the unsafe conditions. Why would they willingly continue to keep these animals in an unsafe location without attempting to make repairs to keep them from harm? The dates speak for themselves. They did nothing until an inspection was forced upon them. By doing nothing they allow more animals to become injured and even die. I find that unacceptable. 

TaraSimpson
TaraSimpson

You're obviously not reading the right story. 27 animals died, not 14! The "farm" they housed them on was not in good conditions and even after being warned, they did nothing.

Karma13
Karma13 like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

@ShawnLa @Karma13 Wow, I guess you choose to overlook the obvious point I was making originally... It took them several months before making those attempts to remedy the reported issues.
 Horses can become hurt in fencing, we've covered that. However, when you become aware of a potential problem with the fencing, or any other hazard, and you make no attempt to remedy the issues when they happen you are then ignoring your responsibility to ensure the animals' safety. If they had resolved the issues when they first became aware of them the other horses wouldn't have been in harms way.

ShawnLa
ShawnLa like.author.displayName 1 Like

@Karma13 @ShawnLa 14 animals died. No report on how the goats or sheep died. One horse died to something that was beyond their control from something wrong with the feed. Two were injured to fencing, and as you know that happens with horses. Two died from falls. Who knows what happened there, sounds like there was a weakness in the fencing and the horses wandered out/got spooked/ ran over cliffs. 

It happens. They remedied the problems.

LittleBlackBird
LittleBlackBird like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 5 Like

i am not vegetarian. however, any animal knowingly being abused for a movie, is disturbing in every light. with the amount of money movie producers make, i would expect every possible course of action to be taken to secure all animals and have then treated humanely. i was planning on going to see this movie in the theaters. now, i will not. for me, the movies are a special treat, for they are just to expesnsive anymore. i will watch the movie, after it comes out on dvd , and will probably burn it from a friend.  when i do go out, i would like to know my money is not going towards people who just dont care about animals to make a buck. thats the bottom point. it has nothing to do with who eats meat or doesnt, its about the unaccepatble abuse and neglect. 

ShawnLa
ShawnLa

@LittleBlackBird How were the animals abused? Neglected, debatable. Abused, no. Animals die, accidents happen.

TaraSimpson
TaraSimpson

Neglect is abuse. Ask any judge, idiot. These accidents were preventable but because they chose to do nothing about it, animals died, that is considered animal cruelty.

imaginaryfriend101
imaginaryfriend101 like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 7 Like

Thank you for sharing this, I won't go to the cinema  to watch that movie. Shame, because I liked the Lord of the Rings trilogy, however I do care for animals so... bye bye Hobbit! 

wth?
wth? like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

@imaginaryfriend101 Did you read the entire article? How about the part where the studio, on their own dime, upgraded someone else's farm to make it safe, and then moved the animals? Or how most of the animals that died were chickens who were eaten by wild dogs? 

Tamalin
Tamalin

@imaginaryfriend keep the compassion do not let people like mrbomb use excues for trying to make you think of money instead of compassion.

Tamalin
Tamalin

sorry keep your fight going to keep this moving looking good.

mrbomb13
mrbomb13

@Tamalin 

Please refer to my above-reply, and do not misconstrue my words.

mrbomb13
mrbomb13 like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 3 Like

@imaginaryfriend101 

...yet, assuming you're not a vegetarian/vegan, you would have no problem with going to the grocery store to buy meat (which comes from butchered animals)...so, "bye bye grocery store" too?  :)

TaraSimpson
TaraSimpson

I am not a vegan but I do eat cruelty free products. I've done my research to find which brands are cruelty free. Not everything in the grocery store come from bad farms although most are.

Tamalin
Tamalin like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 3 Like

what excuse you have for me @mrbomb13 I am vegan? I am and will always fight for compastion, kindness, and teaching people the same. I will not people bully any one about kindness. 

paul4paulville
paul4paulville like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 3 Like

@LittleBlackBird @Arcanum55 @Tamalin @imaginaryfriend101  

@mrbomb13  It's people like you that actually disprove the idea that man is the highest form of animal. Now,

I don't care about animals, and I don't even have a pet. But this is not about animals anymore. It's about people, and their ability to have compassion over other beings. Time knows that SOME people care about animals. That's why they wrote this. And I am pretty sure that the author couldn't care less about what you think. Because the truth is, if someone wants to fight for these kinds of things, things they care about, there's really nothing you can do but let them be. Who are you to tell people what or what not to do, anyway? You're just a j*rk who would say anything he wants. 

Man is a rational animal, they say. But your lack of regard for other people's feelings and plain lack of ability to care for things other than yourself makes me think that the "rational" part does not exist in you. And who cares if mirror neurons don't exist? What @trademarkanimal was saying was that you don't have empathy, plain and simple. And I agree.

This is just a news. Probably a popularity stunt for the movie. If you do not care about it, then just leave the people who do alone. Don't judge them! And don't insinuate that their comments are hypocritical.

Now, I know that since you're smart, you'd probably use a lot of what i said against me, especially the part where I said "Don't judge them!" because it probably seemed like I judged you too. A lot. And I am sorry. But I just had to speak against the mean things that you said. Can't help it. This is actually my first ever comment, and probably the last because I am only ever here to read stuff and not say stuff. I didn't even have an account here until now. So don't bother to come up with something elaborate to rebut. Just take my advice and leave the animal lovers here alone.

Thank you.

Arcanum55
Arcanum55 like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 7 Like

@mrbomb13 @Tamalin The same regard for Actor safety should of been worked out and executed with competency for the animals at whatever cost. A pet pony is not a chicken and shouldn't be confused as one. I do eat animals as animals eat animals. But I work hard for the Humane treatment of them weather a food source or a neglected pet. To me they are just as important as us and should have similar rights to us regarding treatment and safety. How many actors or crew died on set? The level of treatment was substandard and whomever arranged and oversaw their accommodations should be fined large and fired immediately.

mrbomb13
mrbomb13 like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

@Tamalin 

A couple of comments on your reply:

1) I don't think you read my comment carefully enough.  It's not about excuses, or compassion or kindness.  My comment was about exposing hypocrisy, specifically in the instance of not seeing a movie due to alleged animal mistreatment v. not going to a grocery store due to animals getting butchered.  I was calling out the commenter on her hypocrisy.

2) I'm not aiming to 'bullly' anyone; that was your incorrect interpretation.  What I'm instead calling for is a critical discussion on the issue.

mrbomb13
mrbomb13 like.author.displayName 1 Like

Thank you, Time Magazine, for wasting my time with that utter piece of drivel.

What drug convinced you that MOVIE SET ANIMALS were a newsworthy event??

This is why your revenues are sinking, profits are dropping, and popularity/relevancy deteriorating.

You used to be great, and now you're not worth my Time.  

Good riddance...

Tamalin
Tamalin

You make me laugh, lots of  bull.

mrbomb13
mrbomb13

@Tamalin 

Instead of throwing personal attacks, please respond by posting a more fact-based reply.

Thank you.

Tamalin
Tamalin like.author.displayName 1 Like

man you are something else, always looking for a put down. Please do not contact me again do not wish to talk to some one like you. I will stand for compassion not control.

mrbomb13
mrbomb13 like.author.displayName 1 Like

@Tamalin 

Fair enough; we all lead busy lives.

But, in posting that reply, you tacitly concede (for now) that you have no facts to back up (what was essentially) a personal attack.

I hope you find the time to respond in a more appropriate and professional manner in the future.

Take care.

Tamalin
Tamalin

LOL sorry do not have time for your fight to keep this movie looking good.

trademarkanimal
trademarkanimal like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 6 Like

@mrbomb13 And good riddance to people like you that were born without the mirror neurons necessary... physically necessary... to feel empathy.  BTW these mirror neurons are hereditary which is why idiots without feeling like you breed MORE idiots without feeling... who may well grow up to be Americans like those we have all seen do horrible things against the rest of us.

mrbomb13
mrbomb13 like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

@trademarkanimal @mrbomb13 

I'm sorry, but your comments are fundamentally untrue.  Regarding empathy, I used to be a Social Studies teacher, and regularly assumed the role of grief counselor, confidante, "person who's shoulder you could cry on," etc.  It's what allowed me to build trust with other students, parents, teachers, and administrators.  Even the idea that you could pass such a judgment without ever meeting me is offensive.  

Second, the only reason that I'm not flagging your comment is that you have based your opinion off unsettled science.  There still exists disagreement in the scientific community over "mirror neurons."  It's stated that qualitative sources (i.e. non-scientific opinion/conjecture) are partially necessary for mirror neurons to make sense.

Therefore, before you render a science-based diagnosis, you should make sure the science being referenced is indeed valid.  Also, please refrain from using personal attacks, because such attacks 1) weaken your argument and 2) show that you have nothing else better to say.

Thank you for your consideration of these points.

krystalvisions82
krystalvisions82

@Arcanum55 Just the fact your "buddy" said these words "I have no empathy whatsoever towards animals" makes me assume he's a piece of shit. And my uncle is a hunter. You can be a hunter and still have empathy and respect towards the creatures you slaughter. 

Arcanum55
Arcanum55

@mrbomb13 @Arcanum55 Again, to me you are such a really good person. Thanks for listening and look deep to the horrors we afflict on humans and animals alike. It's the only way we can stop it.

Arcanum55
Arcanum55

@mrbomb13 @Arcanum55 He actually left it on my desk as a joke in a large cup for me to find Monday morning. it was terrible for me, but I get his humor. I still can see it, it's haunting. But hunting for food is fine with me, I will never condemn it. But it needs to stay pure and free of shitheads that do it with malice and pain to the animal.

Arcanum55
Arcanum55

@mrbomb13 @Arcanum55 I new you were cool. I knew you were good...thank you

Arcanum55
Arcanum55 like.author.displayName 1 Like

@Tamalin Thank you Tam, he is actually more caring than most I meet. I respect him. I would love if he would check out not only how amazing Animals are, but also how what we are doing to them effects ourselves and will lead to our ultimate demise should we not change our habits of animal torture to ease human pain.

mrbomb13
mrbomb13 like.author.displayName 1 Like

@Arcanum55 

The bit about 'ripping the rabbit's head off' is fascinating to hear.  I've never heard of someone like that in my entire life (learn something new everyday).  

With you vouching for him like that, I will admit that I was wrong to doubt his disposition around other animals.  I apologize for the prior comment about him around pets.

Regarding the "jack off" you mentioned in your prior comment, I had not thought about it from that angle.  Fines are certainly one way to handle the issue; other ways include increased government regulation and revocation of the individual's animal permit. 

Tamalin
Tamalin

You are a good person and no matter what you say to @mrbomb he will twist your words and try to for your mind. He seems to have a control problem. Thanks for your kindness and do not let him get to you.

Arcanum55
Arcanum55

@mrbomb13 @Arcanum55 he is nice guy, he's about 49 now and an avid hunter. You would love him as I do and he would never harm your pets. But rabbit for dinner? Rip it's head off.

Arcanum55
Arcanum55 like.author.displayName 1 Like

@mrbomb13 @Arcanum55 Animas use animals for food, I have no problem with that. In my opinion they deserve equal empathy to us. That jack off that secured the farm I'll bet you was given a sub-standard budget. And I'm sure he found the first closest farm willing to take the cash without a full look over for safety. That's my point. It should of never happened in the first place, and the only way to ensure it doesn't happen again is to levy large fines to all involved.

Arcanum55
Arcanum55 like.author.displayName 1 Like

@mrbomb13 @Arcanum55 No, I never suggested anything like that. Dumb response. I eat animals as I said. I am for ethical treatment and slaughter.

Fish release or eat, no problem.

Keep your dog on a leash for his own safety since we decided we should own them, keep em safe.

Fish in an Aquarium is cruel and yes you should not keep them.

I thought long and hard about my statement and I stick with it.

mrbomb13
mrbomb13

@Arcanum55 

Okay, your buddy should not be around animals if he's acting like that (I would not let him around my girlfriend's pets).  He doesn't sound like much of a sweetheart around 'non-humans.'

My point is that animals do not deserve as much empathy as humans.  We use animals as food, and for agriculture, transportation, and moving heavier objects.  That's not to say that animals deserve your buddy's totally absent sympathy.

Arcanum55
Arcanum55

@mrbomb13 @trademarkanimal Empathy towards Humans was not her point. My buddy is one of the nicest most empathetic guys I ever met towards people. sweetheart. But he would and has torn a rabbits head off without blinking. In his own words with a smile, " I have no empathy towards animals whatsoever." So don't confuse empathy as universal towards all species.

mrbomb13
mrbomb13

@Arcanum55 

Oh really?

Well then, should I think twice about eating non-humans for my daily meals (i.e. fish, meat, etc.)?

Should I think twice before riding a horse the next time I have a chance (since I would not ever think of riding a human)?

Should I refrain from fishing?

How about putting a leash on a dog?

What about keeping a pet fish (when I would never keep a pet human in a swimming pool)?

I would think a little harder about that statement (treating 'non-humans' - love that term by the way - indiscriminately) before making it.

Arcanum55
Arcanum55 like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 4 Like

@mrbomb13 @trademark animal The same empathy you have toward humans i.e. your old students should extend toward non-humans indiscriminately.