Bigfoot DNA ‘Evidence’ Is Published — But More Questions Are Raised

Bigfoot exists and there is DNA to prove it, or at least that’s what one scientific journal is claiming.

  • Share
  • Read Later
Andrew Rich / Getty Images

The DeNovo Scientific Journal that published “evidence” of Bigfoot’s DNA is under fire for its legitimacy.

Bigfoot exists and there is DNA to prove it, or at least that’s what one scientific journal is claiming, according to the Huffington Post U.K.

The study, published in the DeNovo Scientific Journal is a culmination of lead researcher Melba Ketchum’s five years studyingalleged samples of the Sasquatch’s hair, blood, saliva and urine.

However, the legitimacy of the scientific journal that published the Sasquatch Genome Project is being questioned: Ketchum, a Texas researcher and former veterinarian, purchased the publication after her study, titled “Novel North American Hominins: Next Generation Sequencing of Three Whole Genomes and Associated Studies,” had been rejected by other journals.

 “Rather than spend another five years just trying to find a journal to publish and hoping that decent, open minded reviewers would be chosen, we acquired the rights to this journal and renamed it so we would not lose the passing peer reviews that are expected by the public and the scientific community,” wrote Ketchum on the project’s website.

The DeNovo Scientific Journal has no other studies, articles, papers or reviews, and only Ketchum’s paper has been “published” by the journal, NBC News pointed out. It also is not subscribed to by any major library or university, and its website apparently didn’t exist until three weeks ago. In the words of LiveScience’s Benjamin Radford, “It is not an existing, known or respected journal in any sense of the word.”

(MORE: Scientist Sets Out to Prove Sasquatch’s Existence via Blimp)

This isn’t the first time Ketchum’s Bigfoot DNA evidence has been met with criticism.  In November she released a statement about her Bigfoot findings, calling Bigfoot “a human hybrid” that had emerged 15,000 years ago through the mating of a human female and some other speciesunknown to science.  She has called on governments to recognize the Sasquatch as “an indigenous people and immediately protect their human and Constitutional rights.”

At that time, the Bigfoot study had not been peer-reviewed — and according to NBC News, while the study has now been published, it still hasn’t been assessed by reputable scientists.

(MORE: Should We Declare Open Season on Bigfoot?)

Ketchum’s Sasquatch Genome Project team has released a 19-second video, which reportedly shows a sleeping Bigfoot in Kentucky in 2005.  Although as the Huffington Post noted, the video only raises further questions.