Why Los Angeles Is a Bad City to Be a Letter Carrier

In anticipation of National Dog Bite Prevention Week next week, the U.S. Postal Service has released a list of cities that fare the worst when it comes to dog attacks.

  • Share
  • Read Later
Getty Images / iStockphoto

Sadly, “man’s best friend” is often a letter carrier’s worst menace. Despite extensive training on how to avoid aggressive canines — and ample supplies of dog repellant — nearly 6000 postal workers were bitten by dogs in 2012, according to newly-released statistics from the U.S. Postal Service.

Some cities are more fraught with doggie dangers than others, though. Los Angeles, Calif. ranks number one, with 69 postal employees reporting dog bites in 2012. This is the second year in a row that L.A. had the highest number of aggressive pooches on the loose. Houston took the dubious top distinction back in 2010, with 62 carriers reporting bites that year.

(PHOTOS: Top 10 Animal Attacks on Humans)

In the new ranking, San Antonio and Seattle tied for second place, each with 42 attacks each. Overall, 5,879 U.S. Postal Service employees were attacked by dogs last year, a 5% increase from 2011.

Since the postal service knows perfectly well that few experiences are more painful and tedious than waiting in line at a local branch, it’s using the threat of making people do just that to encourage them to keep their pups on a short leash. “If our letter carriers deem your loose dog to be a threat, you’ll be asked to pick up your mail at the Post Office until it’s safe to deliver,” Ken Snavely, the acting postmaster of Los Angeles, said in a statement.

(MORE: Therapy Dogs Arrive in Boston to Comfort Survivors of Marathon Bombing)

The ten worst cities for dog attacks, as determined by the U.S. Postal Service, are listed below, along with the accompanying number of attacks in 2012:

  1. Los Angeles, CA (69)
  2. San Antonio, TX & Seattle, WA (42 each)
  3. Chicago, IL (41)
  4. San Francisco, CA (38)
  5. Philadelphia, PA (34)
  6. Detroit, MI (33)
  7. St. Louis, MO (32)
  8. Baltimore, MD & Sacramento, CA (29)
  9. Houston, TX & Minneapolis, MN (27)
  10. Cleveland and Dayton, OH (26)

Of course postal workers aren’t the only ones getting injured. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimate that approximately 4.7 million Americans are annually bitten by dogs — and half of the victims are children.


The reporter is only reporting the data provided by USPS. It is the management of USPS that is lacking common sense to provide more meaningful statistics. Ironically, it is their own people who are facing the danger of dog bites on daily basis.


Interesting NYC is not on the list even though it's the biggest city in America. Los Angeles is number one but it's the second biggest city in America at 3.8 million. San Francisco has to be the most dangerous city with 38 dog bites but only has 800k people. Chicago had 41 dog bites but they have a population of over 2 1/2 million people.

And why is San Antonio and Seattle combined into one figure??? That doesn't tell us anything.


What the heck?    Doesn't anyone there know any math or basic stats or basic common sense?    What's important is not the total number of dog-bites per city, but the number of bites per population.  Of course LA is going to be #1, it's a huge city.   If you divide the number of bites by the populaton served, you get a much more useful statistic.

Maybe you could hire some reporters with a clue?