CENTURY CITY, CA - JANUARY 31: Actor Bruce Willis attends the dedication and unveiling of a new soundstage mural celebrating 25 years of "Die Hard" at Fox Studio Lot on January 31, 2013 in Century City, California. (Photo by Alberto E. Rodriguez/Getty Images)
A Good Day to Die Hard
The original Die Hard has been called one of the greatest action movies of all time. It’s pretty evident that each subsequent installment hasn’t reached the dizzying heights of that 1988 classic, as Bruce Willis and Alan Rickman went at it on the 30th floor of the Nakatomi Corporation building in Los Angeles.
Twenty-five years on, the fifth film in the series A Good Day to Die Hard — still starring Bruce Willis as bedraggled cop John McClane, still in the wrong place at the wrong time — is set in Russia, which is about as far as you could get from its L.A. roots. The script is provided by Skip Woods (The A-Team) and the director is John Moore (Max Payne). Let us state that expectations aren’t exactly high.
And perhaps that’s the reason for the reported embargo on reviews. A couple of maverick critics did go it alone, however, and the news is as feared. “Continuity has become a thing of the past for the franchise, which would help itself by not continuing anymore,” concludes RedEye. And Blu-Ray.com is even less impressed:
“A Good Day to Die Hard is a painful miscarriage of a movie. It’s a clueless, joyless slog though idiotic filmmaking and dead-eyed paycheck-cashing, unfit to wear the brand name. It’s a heartbreaker, though one that isn’t exactly a shock to the system. R.I.P. Die Hard franchise (1988-1995). We’ll always have Nakatomi Plaza.”
The New York Times doesn’t even think the movie was meant for American viewers: “A Good Day to Die Hard is squarely aimed at the overseas marketplace. About a third of the dialogue is already subtitled, and the rest would take a competent translator about 15 minutes to render.”
TIME REVIEW: Yippee-Ki-Yay, Mother Russia